dzrong Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Can i use Power Pmac Component Library in the VC++6.0 ? If i want to desine the HMI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omron Forums Support Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 PowerPMACCOMLib is C# .NET component and will not directly work with VC++6.0. Atul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KEJR Posted January 12, 2012 Share Posted January 12, 2012 Can i use Power Pmac Component Library in the VC++6.0 ? If i want to desine the HMI. I highly recommend C# over VC++6.0 unless you need blazingly fast performance (Most basic HMIs running on a modern windows PC shouldn't have issues). You can download the Visual Studio "express" for free for basic use. I was skeptical of the .NET stuff a few years ago but the architects of the system did a lot of things right and you can just code faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterso Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 We always use C++ to develop HMI , can I use PowerPmacComLib.dll? or other DLL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveBarnett Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 KEJR... I'm interested in your comment about .NET being "done right". Can you give some examples of what you're referring to, in particular? Thanks ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve.milici Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 We always use C++ to develop HMI , can I use PowerPmacComLib.dll? or other DLL You would use the "Power PMAC Development Kit (PDK)". You can order this from your local distributor. The order p/n: 3A0-PPCOMM-35X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clopedandle Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 You can use the DLL with C++, but it is not native C++ code. To use C++ directly, you would have to write your own library, basically. Not impossible, but you have to be familiar with PPMAC, for sure. Getting the DLL to work with C++ is a bit of a hack (I got it to work years ago mostly just for fun), so C# is definitely preferable like KEJR said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts